The reformed evangelical world has been rocked this week with news of Steve Lawson’s “inappropriate relationship that he has had with a woman.” (You can read the statement from the elders at Trinity Bible Church here or his own One Passion Ministries here.)
The response was immediate. He was removed from his church. Ministries like Ligonier and The Master’s Seminary removed him from his position and took down all his content. There is consensus that Steve Lawson has permanently disqualified himself from ministry. I’m hard-pressed to think of an example of someone so influential and well-connected in the reformed evangelical world that has fallen to the extent of Steve Lawson.
What’s worse, as details continue to come forth, it seems as if the deception and sin was greater than what many initially thought—and hoped. The “inappropriate relationship” spanned years and there was no noble confession, but it was found out, forcing an admission.
It is overwhelming to consider his wife of 40 years, children, grandchildren, and those who were close to him. Their trust was betrayed. They need our prayers and support.
It is heartbreaking to consider what this has done for Trinity Bible Church. As a minister of a congregation, I can testify of the relationship that develops between a preacher and the people. People have such respect for the messenger of a life-giving message. That admiration of Steve Lawson as one who taught the word of God, makes this news crushing to that congregation. They need our prayers such that the work does not come to ruin.
My heart is also heavy for John MacArthur who trusted Steve Lawson with a prominent role in his ministry to train men. It is through the ministries of RC Sproul and John MacArthur that Steve Lawson became a trusted voice for expositional preaching in our generation. MacArthur, Ligonier ministries, and all those who supported Steve Lawson need our prayers and encouragement.
The damage to the wider body of Christ from Steve Lawson’s sin is incalculable. He had great influence for good in the body of Christ, but that influence comes with possibility of great harm—a possibility now realized. The sin of a child in a home has consequences, how much more the sin of a father? The sin of a citizen in a country has consequences, how much more the sin of the leader of that nation? Steve Lawson’s sin, not unique among men, has great consequence because of the position of trust and influence given to him.
We even experience the effects of his sin in Calgary. I’m currently enrolled in the Doctor of Ministry program at The Master’s Seminary having spent the last two years under Lawson’s teaching. I was expecting to receive my degree from him next May. He came to Calgary last October for our King and Kingdom conference and many in our church have benefited from his teaching. Leaders do sin, but this one hurts.
How ought we to process all this? Let me offer the following reflections:
We should mourn. As mentioned already, we should grieve with those who grieve (Romans 12:15) and pray for those close to Steve Lawson who have been devastated by his sin. We should also pray for Steve Lawson. We should pray for his full repentance, humility, and that he would find mercy in Jesus Christ.
We should hate sin. Sin is evil. Sin is destructive. Sin is ugly. Sin is foolish. We especially should hate the sin of adultery. Proverbs 6:32–33 says, “He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself. He will get wounds and dishonor, and his disgrace will not be wiped away.” Sin is shameful. Sin sent Christ to the cross and is the scourge of God’s creation. We should loath sin in all its forms.
We should flee sin. As we hate the sin and fallout of Steve Lawson’s actions, we should run from any hint of sin in our lives. A sin like adultery involves 1000 other sins. There is lust, deception, hypocrisy, running from accountability, neglecting wife and family, lack of confession, and so forth. I imagine that most men or women don’t set out to commit adultery, but they run through smaller sins, excusing them, rather than confessing them and bringing them to light. Are there “small” sins in your life? Are there “respectable” sins? Are there “hidden” sins? Do not let them fester. Come to the light! Find forgiveness in Jesus today before more hooks from the evil one sink into your flesh and drag you into a banquet in the grave (Proverbs 9:18).
We should fear. As Proverbs 9 warns about Lady Folly and her seductive ways, we are called to listen to Wisdom. It says in Proverbs 9:10, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” When something like this happens, we need to get back to basics, back to the beginning. We need to fear the Lord. This fear is a reverence and awe for God. It is a trust in God. But it is also a real fear or terror of God. In 1 Timothy 5:20, Paul addresses elders who are caught in sin. We read, “As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear.” When a man like Steve Lawson is exposed, we, the church, should stand in fear. Our God is a consuming fire (Hebrews 12:29). He does not look lightly upon sin. May we stand in fear and be driven to the refuge of Jesus Christ.
We should recalibrate our understanding of greatness. In our communication age, those with gifts of communication are exalted to places of influence and authority. In the kingdom of God, however, the greatest are those who are obedient to the law of God (Matthew 5:19). We live in an evangelical culture that values ministry giftedness over godliness. We value ability over humility. We value status over sanctification. We love Puritan doctrine but not so much Puritan piety.[1] We value grace but generally see it as antithetical to law. We need to love the law of God (Psalm 119). We need to love holiness. Fathers, do you want to be a great husband and father? Be holy. Pastors, do you want to be a great shepherd to the flock? Be holy. Do you want to be a blessing to the Lord and those around you? Be holy. M’Cheyne said, “The greatest need of my people is my personal holiness.”
We should be on guard against pride. Proverbs 16:18 says, “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” I have no doubt that pride is at work long before adultery takes place. Preachers especially are in danger of this sin. We are esteemed, upheld, and set before watching eyes and waiting ears. No wonder the Scriptures give warnings to elders to be mature in the faith, men of humility and Christ-like character. The conference speaker—even more than the local church pastor—can be seen as the expert, the man of God, and the one whom God is using to bring blessing. A sense of superiority and invincibility can arise. A sense that God approves of them, even in sin, because they have been exalted among believers. Oh, how we need to guard against pride and cultivate humility. Sexual sin especially is rooted in pride. We need to take the axe to the root of any manifestation of pride. Be killing pride or it will be killing you. Here is a call for self-watchfulness.
We should value the local church and the family. I’m even more persuaded than previously that itinerant ministry or the conference circuit speaker is unhealthy. I can think of cases where husband and wife travel together, ministering together, and it is a beautiful thing. However, we must value the local church and the family far above the big names and dynamic conference speakers. We need to be wholeheartedly committed to a family of faith. The preacher-man should be a family-man (1 Timothy 3:4–5). The shepherd should smell like sheep. We need people who know our strengths and our weaknesses. We need people, lots of people, around us who know we’re nothing special. We need real accountability.
We should be infatuated with our spouse. Sex is not sinful. Sexual desire is not perverted. But sex and sexual desire has only one place in God’s created order—inside the covenant of marriage between one man and one woman. Intimacy with your spouse is both an indicator and a cultivator of health in your relationship. Proverbs 5:18–19 says, “Let your fountain be blessed, and rejoice in the wife of your youth, a lovely deer, a graceful doe. Let her breasts fill you at all times with delight; be intoxicated always in her love.” These aren’t my words. These aren’t dirty words. These are God’s words. These words were given as a warning against adultery (cf. Proverbs 5). If there are problems of intimacy in your marriage, they need to be fixed asap.
We should value prayer like we value the word. Reformed evangelicals have a reverence for the word, and therefore for the preached word and those who preach that word. We must admit that while we’ve seen a recovery in preaching, we need a revival in prayer. M’Cheyne said, “Study universal holiness of life. Your whole usefulness depends on this, for your sermons last but an hour or two; your life preaches all the week. If Satan can only make a covetous minister a lover of praise, of pleasure, of good eating, he has ruined your ministry. Give yourself to prayer, and get your texts, your thoughts, your words from God. Luther spent his best three hours in prayer.” Ministers are those who devote themselves “to prayer and to the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:4). Seminaries, conferences, workshops, and podcasts are devoted to the latter rather than the former. Is the order of these words in Acts 6 important? Is repentance called for here? Clearly, a fallen man can be a man of the word. Can a fallen man be a man of prayer? Is it not in prayer that the root of hypocrisy is revealed? Is not prayer the barometer of godliness? Oh, may this drive us to our knees in prayer.
We should be encouraged. Let me end with this reflection. We should know that the word of God never fails. Messengers may fail, but the message still stands. Christ will build his church. The church does not succeed or fail on account of Steve Lawson, myself, or any other minister of the gospel. The church will succeed because it is Christ’s church, and he is always faithful. Christ has no sin. He never deceives. He never lets us down. He never fails. Men may fail us, but Christ never will. Men may disappoint us and hurt us, but Christ never will. Even considering this terrible sin, the word remains true. In fact, that is why the reformed evangelical world is shocked by this news, because it is so contrary to the message. Sin doesn’t invalidate the word, sin is exposed because of the validity of the word. The word reveals. The gospel remains. The church is built. Christ, not any man, is our Savior and hope. May we be brought closer to Christ. Christ is the man. Preachers are just delivery boys bringing news of Christ. May this event drive us all to Christ such that we adore Christ and make much of him.
—Tim Stephens
[1] As I consider the Puritan works that are re-published in our day, predominantly they are doctrinal treatises rather than their works on civics or piety. Many evangelicals today, while admiring Puritan doctrine, would consider them prudish, especially for how Puritan men would conduct themselves around women.
This week we are introducing a new songbook we’ve recently published as a supplement to our hymnal. It is called Psalms for Singing: A Selection of Psalms Ancient and Modern. This new songbook contains 38 psalms set to music designed for congregational singing. A few of the tunes will be familiar but most of the tunes are unique and composed exclusively for each psalm. While this means it will take a little more time to learn a new psalm, it will be much more memorable once it’s learnt.
The psalms we’ve chosen are set to music from the time of the reformation (e.g.. Genevan and Scottish psalms) but also contain selections composed in the last decade. We’re excited that we can begin to incorporate these psalms into our corporate worship on the Lord’s Day.
(Note: If you wish to learn these psalms on your own or use them in family worship, copies are available at the church, and we recommend the app “Sing Your Part” which allows you to hear the music for each psalm—and learn the parts too.)
The following is the preface to Psalms for Singing: A Selection of Psalms Ancient and Modern.
Colossians 3:16 says, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.”
The church has been blessed with a rich heritage of music. In our local church, we desire to stand on that heritage and fulfill Scripture’s command to sing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. In the last century the evangelical church has neglected psalms in worship. Perhaps this is due to a perceived theological discontinuity between the Old Testament and the New Testament and discarding the musical heritage of the past to cater to the culture of the present. However, we know that God is the primary audience of our worship and there is a rich continuity between Old and New Testaments and in church history over the centuries.
The psalms are important to sing because they are Spirit-inspired songs and prayers designed for God’s people in all times and places. They are rich in theology and abounding with the attributes of God. Second, psalms cover a wide range of genres. Some of those, like imprecation and lament, are difficult to find in hymnody today yet are God-given and needful for the church. Third, many psalms are masculine, warrior psalms for a triumphant church. This is a contrast to the many sentimental and feminine songs of today. Fourth, many psalms point toward our Savior, Jesus Christ, and his glorious kingdom. These are songs of hope, victory, and remind us of God’s faithfulness. Fifth, in learning to sing the psalms we are learning to hide God’s word in our hearts. Scripture memory is an excellent way to grow in our sanctification and singing is the best way to memorize Scripture.
The psalms in this selection cover a wide range of church history and therefore music styles are quite varied. This is intended. Some of the songs are difficult to learn but we believe that the reward is worth the effort. We joyfully raise our voices with the Covenanters of Scotland or the Reformers in Geneva and with all those who have faithfully worshiped our great God before us. We are not reinventing worship but stand in a long line of godly men and women who adore Jesus Christ and sing psalms of praise in his name.
May this supplemental psalter bless the congregation of Fairview Baptist Church and bring glory to God as we worship him according to his word, in Spirit and in truth.
We are restarting our Fellowship Meal this Sunday after a renovation to paint the gym and refinish the floor. Whether or not you are new to our Fellowship Meal, I want you to scan this webpage (https://www.fairviewbaptistchurch.ca/fellowship-meal/) to acquaint yourself with our shared meal on Sundays so that you are prepared with what you need to bring.
Beyond the reminders already listed on that page, I want to remind you of a few things.
First, the purpose of the meal is fellowship.[1] Food is not the goal but facilitates it. The Fellowship Meal is a time is for conversation which includes welcoming visitors, reconnecting with friends, exhorting and encouraging brothers and sisters, and discussing Christ and his word. Lunch is the setting. Fellowship is the substance.
Success is not measured by the variety or amount of food you consumed but in meaningful conversations that encouraged you and others to trust and obey Christ more.
Second, the Fellowship Meal provides an opportunity for service. I’m not a fan of the word volunteer but prefer the biblical term of “servants.” Servant is a fitting description of the many people involved in setting up and cleaning up the lunch. Like most ministries, the bulk of the workload can fall on the shoulders of a few.
As we resume our meal, we should all remember that service is sacrifice and worship (Rom 12:1). Everyone is busy. Everyone has limitations. Everyone has valid reasons why they can’t right now. But the ones who serve go above and beyond to give themselves to the service of the body.
The Fellowship Lunch should not be facilitated by a few servants meeting the needs of the many. This is not a job for “them.” The Fellowship Lunch is an “us” thing. We should all help. We should all serve. We should all fellowship. We should all clean up. Then we all depart. When we notice something lacking, we should step in to help rather than add another task to the ones already serving.
We have roughly 200 people stay for the potluck every Sunday. This is a big job. If that load is not shared, it will crush the few burdened by the weight. Let’s all be servant-minded.
Third, the Fellowship Meal provides an opportunity for discipleship. Children in our congregation need to be taught to learn restraint and respect. Parents, you must teach your children how to behave in a communal meal.
Men, you must lead by example. I’ve seen food scarce, a long line, and men at the front with loaded plates. This is a heart of sin on display and a missed opportunity for discipleship and growth. I’ve also seen work needing to be done when people are leaving or continue speaking with people they speak with every week. This is selfishness on display. Again, this is an opportunity for discipleship and growth. We don’t want a fellowship meal to be a display of sin, but an opportunity to display and teach true discipleship—a heart of service that discerns the needs of those around us.
Fourth, a note on dietary needs. With so many food allergies of varying kinds and varying degrees, it must be the responsibility of those who have allergies to accommodate their own food needs. There is no solution that will accommodate everyone. For some, this may mean they bring their own food and cannot take from the communal food. For others, this means they must be very careful in their selection. Each family or individual must exercise responsibility for their own needs while seeking to serve others.
There is a ditch we can fall into when we talk about serving. We can read passages about serving others and then expect others to accommodate our needs. We read the Bible to say, “They must serve me.” We think we have a biblical basis for others to serve us. But we cannot reverse the Golden Rule and expect from others what we would like for ourselves.
Conclusion
It is my desire to see the Fellowship Meal as an important ministry that fosters warmth, hospitality, and service. I do not want to see the meal become a burden but a blessing. Let us not fall into the error of the Corinthians where their weekly meal was a display of their selfishness and sin. Let us rather see Christ formed in us as we speak with one another and serve one another.
“And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Acts 2:42).
[1] Fellowship is a word describing close association where people share mutual interests. Christian fellowship describes close relationships among believers who love Christ and want to see him honored above all.
God’s wrath and grace go together. When God comes to judge, he also comes to save. The judgment of the wicked is the salvation of the righteous.
Revelation 19 describes the judgment of Christ upon the nations of the earth. “He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty” (Rev 19:15). As the wicked are destroyed heaven erupts in praise saying, “Hallelujah! Salvation and glory and power belong to our God” (Rev 19:1)
2 Thessalonians 1 describes the righteous judgment of God. It describes angels “inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus” (2 Thess 1:8). On that day the saints will glorify him for their salvation has come (2 Thess 1:10).
The Psalms are filled with this theme of judgment and salvation. “From the heavens you uttered judgment; the earth feared and was still, when God arose to establish judgment, to save all the humble of the earth” (Ps 76:8–9).
When God judges the wicked, it is salvation for the righteous. When God visits men in judgment, he visits his people in salvation. When God makes known his wrath, he also makes known his grace.
God’s Wrath Today
Why is this principle important for us to recognize? Because it is clear God’s wrath is being revealed today.
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth” (Rom 1:18). This verse and the remaining verses of Romans 1 describe our society today. We live in an age where the “wisest minds” are fools and suppress the truth of God in unrighteousness (v. 22). We live in a culture where people do not want to give thanks to God or honor him as God (v. 21). We live in a time when so much is known about God’s universe, yet people exchange the glory of Creator and worship the creation (vv. 19–20, 23).
The rest of Romans 1 speaks about God turning a people over to their own sinful passions and desires. It describes sodomy and lesbianism as the revelation of God’s judgment. To be clear, the celebration of LGBTQ today is not going to incur God’s judgment, it is God’s judgment. He’s given people over to their corruption. We’re so foolish, we don’t even know what a man or woman is today. We live in an age defined by the “debased mind” (v. 28) that gives hearty approval to all manner of ungodliness.
Many have pointed out the similarities between God’s wrath revealed in Romans 1 and our society today. My intention is to remind you that God’s wrath always coincides with his salvation. As seen already, when God comes to judge, he also comes to save. God’s wrath is being revealed today all around us, therefore, his salvation is also at hand.
Our church saw this, in part, during COVID. We witnessed God’s judgment and God’s salvation. Disease and inept leaders are signs of God’s judgment. Calvin once said that when God wants to judge a nation, he gives them wicked leaders. Government policies bringing hardship upon the people are a form of judgment upon a godless nation. (We’re still suffering from COVID policies that caused rapid inflation.) Policies that sought to restrict worship of Christ’s church were also signs of God’s judgment upon a wicked nation and heartless pastors. But God was also working to save. Never have I experienced a time when people were so primed for the gospel. Never did we, nor other churches, experience so much vitality, hope, salvation, and sanctification as we did during those trying years. When God comes to judge, he comes to save.
The same will hold true in our woke, LGBTQ-promoting, climate-alarmist, religiously pluralistic culture. God is certainly here to judge, but take heart, he is also here to save.
Three Recommendations
Here are three pieces of advice given the outpouring of God’s wrath and grace today.
1. Don’t Despair
God’s judgment upon our nation and its opposition to the truth is a sign of their destruction and our salvation. As the church stays on mission and stays united, not frightened in anything, “this is a clear sign to them of their destruction, but of your salvation, and that from God” (Phil1:28).
God is dealing with a people bent on bursting their bonds apart (Ps 2:3). He sits in the heavens and laughs (Ps 2:4). Take comfort. Don’t despair. Yes, God is here to judge, but he is also here to save. The fields are ripe for harvest. Pray to the Lord of the harvest.
2. Don’t Side with Evil Doers
As Christians, we want to put ourselves in the way of grace, rather than in the path of wrath. When the days are evil and God’s judgment is at hand, “take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them” (Eph 5:11). In this day of evil, we should not be “bridge-building” by being soft on sin. It is common today in evangelicalism to be understanding and soft to sodomites while being judgmental and vicious to those on the theological right. There is always the perpetual danger of wanting to win the world by being loved by the world, forgetting that “friendship with the world is enmity with God” (James 4:4).
We must seek what is pleasing to our Lord lest we get caught up in his judgment. We must flee Sodom without looking back. As our Lord says, “Remember Lot’s wife” (Luke 17:32).
3. Don’t Retreat
In evil days when the wrath of God is being revealed, we may be tempted to retreat. We want to keep out of the rain until the sun starts shining again. “Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, making the best use of the time, because the days are evil” (Eph 5:15–16). This passage reminds us that in evil days we want to be careful to make the best use of time. The day of God’s wrath is not a day of retreat for God’s people. When God comes to judge, this is a time to shout for joy and go forth to plunder the kingdom of the evil one.
This is a time for warrior psalms sung with joy and thanksgiving (Eph 5:19–20). This is a time to shine as lights in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation (Phil 2:15). This is a time to go forth and make disciples (Matt 28:19). Let us not retreat in fear as God’s judgment comes to our nation, but go forth on mission, in joy, seeking to do the will of the Lord, taking every thought captive to obey Christ (2 Cor 10:5).
Take heart. He is with you always, to the end of the age.
Life in Calgary the past few weeks has produced an eerie feeling of déjà vu. The daily updates and calls to restrict water usage to save our water supply remind us of COVID-era restrictions.
The same playbook is in use. Heightened rhetoric, worst-case scenarios, group sacrifice, threats of enforcement action, along with half-truths or outright lies are all fair game to achieve the desired result—coercing the people of Calgary to use less water.
More similarities include extending restrictions from a few days to a few weeks with talk about permanent restrictions on water use. We’re called to make sacrifices for the good of our neighbor while we’re encouraged to call the city to snitch on our neighbor. Our mayor makes the repeated claim that this is not a conspiracy—not realizing that she is the one fueling conspiracy by these tactics.
The mayor and other city officials keep on claiming that the city will run out of water unless we make sacrifices to conserve it. We’re told that this is a crisis—a catastrophe—but two minutes of research will reveal that the problem is not Calgarians using their water, but neglect and disrepair of important city infrastructure.
The northern part of Calgary relies on the Bearspaw water treatment facility. The main line connecting this facility to the city is old and the pipe has burst, stopping this important source of clean water. However, the water system in the city is interconnected and so the Glenmore water treatment facility in the south is providing water for north and south until repairs to the water line are complete.
Contrary to the repeated claim of officials, it is not the case that we are running out of water; we have plenty of water. The issue is bandwidth. The bottleneck is the amount of treated water that can travel from the south to the north. If water demand is higher than the flowrate from our one operational treatment facility, then we have a problem. However, even that potential problem is mitigated by several underground water reservoirs around the city that store water. There would have to be an extreme and sustained demand that exceeds the flow rate of water coming from the treatment facility in the south. At this point, average water demand across the city is less than the capacity of the water supplied by the southern treatment facility. Is this a legitimate concern? Yes. Is this an existential crisis? Hardly.
A Better Way
It would not take long to explain to the people of Calgary the truth rather than resort to misleading statements, fear-inducing scenarios, or threats and fines to coerce water conservation. There is a better way.
Here’s my advice to our city officials.
First, take responsibility. Don’t scold Calgarians for using water that they pay for in fees and taxes. Calgarians, who live in a modern city of 1.5 million people, are not unreasonable to expect to take a shower, wash their laundry, and water their flowers. This water problem is a government problem. We live in a city where infrastructure has been neglected for too long because of political ideologues spending money on non-essentials—like painting rainbows on roads, buildings, and uniforms. Take responsibility, invest in infrastructure, pave our roads, and care for public places. You don’t need more money. You don’t need to blame the province or the feds. The money that you have needs to be used responsibly to care for our roads, bridges, communications, electricity, water supply, and other critical infrastructure—this is your job.
Second, don’t fuel conspiracies by talking about water restrictions being the new normal. A broken water main is not the time to be pushing leftist ideologies that promote fear and portray human beings as the problem of the planet. Municipal leaders should stay in their lane rather than dragging the city down with the tired tropes of LGBTQ rights and climate change.
Third, don’t create a climate of fear. Is one broken pipe really a cause for great alarm? What happens when this pipe or similar one needs maintenance? Are more than a million people expected to have 1-minute showers and let their flowers die while the city performs maintenance? Remind people that homes only account for 30% of water use in the city. Tell people you’re bringing in experts to get it fixed ASAP. I understand that creating fear and using words like “crisis” and “catastrophe” get many people to change behavior, but fearmongering is not an effective long-term approach to governing. Soon, you’ll be ignored, despised, and you’ll lose any credibility you may have had. I present Jason Kenney and Deena Hinshaw as exhibit A.
Fourth, give real and reasoned solutions based on truth. Tell us what communities are most affected. Tell us the time of day when water demand is highest. Since it’s a matter of flowrate, when we use water is just as important as how much we use. It is a small ask to delay a washing machine or dishwasher to non-peak times. Give people all the information so they can make responsible choices. Don’t manipulate the data to realize your desired outcome. Tell people the truth.
A Difference in Worldview
Why do modern governments handle crises this way? Why is there so much fear, threatening, lies and patronizing? It is all a matter of worldview.
It is unquestionable that our society has grown more socialistic and communistic. Part and parcel with these societal orders is the need for overlords—I mean government officials—to tell the masses what they must do. Socialism requires a ruling class to manage every aspect of life from the economy to education to healthcare, and even to the home. Responsibility is removed from the people and entrusted to all-wise leaders. These leaders think they can manage our lives better than we can. They increase our taxes because they think they can spend our money better than we can.
With socialism, citizens of a city or country are viewed as the “masses” rather than the “people.” The masses serve the system, rather than the system serving the people. It is a hive-mind mentality where the queen bee calls the shots, and the workers carry out her will. “Everything will be fine if everyone gets in line and does what they’re told.”
This view of ruling is antithetical to the Christian world and life view. According to the Bible, people in a society are entrusted with responsibility. Self-government is a prerequisite in a Christian society. In turn, leaders are called servants or ministers rather than overlords and commanders (Mark 10:42–44). That is why, according to our Christian heritage, our government magistrates are called civil servants, and our head of state is called the Prime Minister! According to Christ, the prime minister is the one who is the slave of all (Mark 10:44)! As servants of the people, our leaders should be committed to truth, rather than cunning or underhanded tactics to get their way (2 Corinthians 4:2).
We can expect more COVID déjà vu in the future unless and until the gospel of Jesus Christ has its redeeming effects on the hearts of our leaders. May God be pleased to do this for his glory and our good.
The intersection of human responsibility and God’s sovereignty is a perennial discussion. The Bible teaches both, yet most understand these ideas to be contradictory. It is always a temptation to elevate one and minimize—or “qualify”—the other. We can feel that if we emphasis God’s sovereignty, we necessarily minimize human responsibility, or vice versa. If this is you, it is likely that you misunderstand responsibility.
I understand that discussions of this sort can, and often do, get very emotional (and maybe I’ve offended you already). Risking offense for the sake of truth, let me try to address one piece that makes up the larger puzzle of God’s sovereignty and human responsibility.
I want to demonstrate how human responsibility is vital to the gospel and how we can easily think wrongly about responsibility.
A Pop Quiz
Consider these questions. When God renders a “guilty” verdict on the day of judgment, who is responsible? When God condemns a person, on what basis are they condemned?
When God renders a “innocent” verdict on the day of judgment, who is responsible? When God justifies a person, on what basis are they declared righteous?
Most would answer the first two questions this way: The individual person, and their own sin, is the basis for their own condemnation. They stand responsible for their own condemnation.
And most would answer the second two questions this way: Jesus Christ, and his atoning work, is the basis for their justification. It is only on account of Jesus that anyone can be made righteous.
Do you see an error in these answers? Did you catch the contradiction? I’d like to point out a common mistake and clear the air on an important gospel issue.
To the Word and to the Testimony
To better understand human responsibility, I want you to consider what Scripture says about who stands responsible for our condemnation.
The Bible clearly speaks to this issue in Romans 5:12–21. In this passage we see a contrast between Adam and Christ. We can read the summary of the argument in verses 18–19.
“Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous” (Romans 5:18–19).
Do you see the difference with the answers offered above? The Scriptures say that our condemnation is due to Adam’s one sin in the same way that our justification is due to Christ’s one act of sacrifice.
We are sinners, yes. We are guilty, yes. But we are condemned because we are born in Adam. The Bible portrays humanity in one of two states: in Adam or in Christ. Those in Adam are condemned as sinners. Those in Christ are justified as righteous.
Evangelicals believe in original sin. Most understand this to teach that we inherit a sinful nature from Adam, and so sin like Adam. Romans 5 affirms this but teaches us more. We not only inherit a sinful nature from Adam, but we are also declared guilty because of Adam. That is, because of Adam’s sin we are born guilty—imputed guilty by God.
We don’t like this idea. Many reject this because it doesn’t “work” with our notions of responsibility. How can we be held responsible for Adam’s sin and be declared guilty because of it? Adam is so far removed from us; it is not fair that we should be guilty for something he did.
However, if we don’t affirm that we are imputed guilty because of Adam, how can we be so confident that we shall be imputed righteous because of Jesus Christ?
This is why imputed guilt from Adam is such an important gospel issue. Those who take exception to being declared guilty because of Adam’s sin, take no umbrage that they can be declared righteous because of Jesus’ sacrifice. I don’t hear Christians complaining that it isn’t fair that Jesus’ act of atonement is applied to them. I don’t hear people arguing that they should stand before God on their own merits. No! We all want the merits of Jesus Christ to be credited to us. But we bristle at the thought of Adam’s sin being credited to us!
We can’t have it both ways. The Bible teaches us that our condemnation is due to imputation. We are credited with Adam’s sin because we are descendants of Adam. We are condemned because of the sin of our father. But this is according to God’s glorious design so that he can impute righteousness to those who have faith in Christ. God credits us with Adam’s guilt so that he might credit us with Christ’s righteousness. The gospel depends upon imputation—of guilt on one hand or righteousness on the other. Without imputation of guilt, on what basis can there be imputation of righteousness?
In our day of individualism we have lost the covenant or headship principle in Scripture. Adam is the representative or covenant head of humanity. Likewise, Christ is the representative or covenant head of a new humanity. We are born in Adam and must be born again in Christ. If we are in Adam, we are condemned along with Adam. If we are in Christ, we are justified along with Christ. Our eternal state is determined by our covenant head—Adam or Christ, death or life (1 Corinthians 15:22).
Why is this important?
There is a point coming after that exegetical summary. In fact, there are two points to note.
First, imputed guilt provides us insight into how the gospel “works.” God is a God of order, justice, and wisdom. He designed covenant headship so that we could be forgiven in Jesus. The gospel depends upon this double imputation.
Second, rejecting imputed guilt exposes a defective view of human responsibility. My hunch is that many who question imputed guilt have a faulty view of responsibility. Let’s call this faulty view the zero-sum view of responsibility. Here’s an example of it in action. If a husband and wife get in a fight, we will think one is 80% responsible and the other is 20% responsible. Maybe it’s 50/50, or maybe one is completely at fault and the other is the innocent victim. In these cases, we act as if responsibility must add up to make 100%. That’s zero-sum thinking. In our example above, if Adam is 100% responsible for our condemnation—and he is—then we must be 0% responsible. We know that conclusion is wrong and so this is why the imputation of Adam’s guilt is denied. It doesn’t make sense to us because we know we are responsible.
This is also why some deny God’s unconditional election. If God is responsible in showing grace to save some and withholds that grace to condemn others, then how can anyone be held responsible? (This, by the way, is the objection of Romans 9:19.) How is this reconciled? Many times people reject God’s sovereignty and Adam’s covenant headship because of their unquestioned commitment to zero-sum responsibility.
But is this how responsibility works?
In short, no.
A husband, as head of the home, is responsible for the sins of his household (Adam, where are you? [Gen 3:9]). However, his wife and children are still responsible for their own sin. Responsibility is not a zero-sum game. Everyone in the household is fully responsible for their own actions and how they have served in their God-given roles. The responsibility of one does not minimize the responsibility of the other. In a quarrel, the husband is fully responsible for his sin and the wife is fully responsible for hers.
More controversial, if a man sees a woman walking down the street and commits the sin of lust, typical thinking concludes that the woman is not at all responsible, no matter what she may be wearing. According to zero-sum thinking, if someone was to suppose the woman was a little guilty by her provocative dress—maybe like 5% guilty—then the man would only be 95% guilty. The thought that the man’s guilt is lessened because of a woman’s dress creates a strong reaction which clears the woman of any guilt. However, if we understand that the man is 100% responsible for his lust and the woman is 100% responsible for being a temptress, then we can affirm that they are both responsible, but not for the same sin and not in the same way.
So too, Adam is responsible for the condemnation of all men (Romans 5:18) yet we are still responsible for our sin before a holy God (“and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done” [Revelation 20:13]).
In like manner, Christ is responsible for our salvation (Romans 5:18) yet we are still responsible for our actions before God (“for we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil” [2 Corinthians 5:10]).
Responsibility is not a zero-sum game.
Wrapping Things Up
How is this all relevant to human responsibility and divine sovereignty?
First, the imputation of Adam’s guilt must be affirmed and zero-sum responsibility must be rejected. We must view responsibility through a biblical lens. CRT and other Marxist theories are predicated upon zero-sum thinking. For example, if someone is wealthy, then they have wealth at the expense of the poor. We must abandon the presuppositions of secular thinking and affirm biblical responsibility before we can address the issue of human responsibility and divine sovereignty.
Second, we must apply this insight of responsibility to the larger issue of human responsibility and divine sovereignty. Again, divine sovereignty is typically minimized or qualified because of the same zero-sum thinking about responsibility. But this leads us to the wrong conclusion. God, according to his unconditional election, is responsible for showing his wrath, justice, and power on “vessels of wrath prepared for destruction.” He is also responsible for showing his love and grace on “vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory” (Romans 9:22–23). And, at the same time, Adam is responsible (Romans 5:12), and individual human beings are responsible for their own condemnation (Revelation 20:13). One responsibility does not cancel out the other, nor can it be weighted to add up to 100%. God and man are both responsible, but not in the same way, and without the responsibility of the one minimizing the responsibility of the other.
May this help you understand how both God and man are responsible on their own terms without qualifying the responsibility of the one to uphold it in the other.
The following article is based on the sermon Descent Into Hell which you can watch or listen to here.
Christian thinking can be influenced by culture around us. Today, materialistic naturalism is so prominent in the world of ideas that concepts like angels, demons, spirits, and the underworld seem more like fairy-tale fiction than reality.
But the Bible affirms that the unseen world is just a real as what is seen. Human beings are certainly more than physical—we have a soul or spirit. God himself is a spirit with no physical dimensions or form. Yet we spend little time considering unseen realities. This article seeks to explore the depths of the underworld, understanding this reality in the light of Scripture.
Three Realms
The Scriptures speak of different realms or places. Philippians 2 is a familiar passage but there is one detail that likely missed your attention.
Philippians 2:6–11 says, “though [Christ] was in the form of God, [he] did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
Notice the scope of Christ’s dominion in his exaltation. He has authority in heaven and on earth and under the earth—three realms. The earth we know. It is seen. We can touch it. The other two realms are not physical but spiritual. Heaven is the home of God where his presence is manifest and where the holy angels reside. Then we have under the earth mentioned. This is the place of the dead. We see these same realms in other places of Scripture (cf. Rev 5:3; Job 11:7–9; Ps 139:7–8).
The Underworld
The realm “under the earth” has many names in Scripture. “Sheol” is used in the OT and means the abode of the dead. This word is often translated “Hades” in the Greek translation of the OT. The word “Hades” means unseen place. The Bible also uses terms like the pit, the abyss, the depths of the sea, or the deep to refer to Sheol.
We know the underworld is a spiritual place since you die to go there, and death is the separation of the body and spirit. A body without a spirit is a corpse and a spirit without a corpse is a “shade” or disembodied spirit (cf. Isaiah 14:9; 26:14).
In speaking of the king of Babylon, Isaiah 14:9–11 says, “Sheol beneath is stirred up to meet you when you come; it rouses the shades to greet you, all who were leaders of the earth; it raises from their thrones all who were kings of the nations. All of them will answer and say to you: ‘You too have become as weak as we! You have become like us!’ Your pomp is brought down to Sheol, the sound of your harps; maggots are laid as a bed beneath you, and worms are your covers.”
The grave (Sheol) is not just where the unrighteous dead go, but the righteous as well. Genesis 37:35 describes when Jacob thought that his son Joseph was dead. It says, “All his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted and said, ‘No, I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning.’” In Isaiah 38, Hezekiah writes of his near-death experience when he was sick, and the Lord added fifteen years to his life. He said after recovering from his sickness, “I said, In the middle of my days I must depart; I am consigned to the gates of Sheol for the rest of my years. I said, I shall not see the Lord, the Lord in the land of the living” (Isaiah 38:10–11).
In this story of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19–31) we see both the righteous and the wicked in Sheol. Lazarus is in a place of comfort by Abraham’s side, and the rich man is in torment. They are all in the same realm although their experience is entirely different. One might say they are in a different compartment, section, or level of Sheol.
Levels in the Underworld
While it might seem counter-intuitive to describe a spiritual place with physical descriptions, it is the best we can do to understand the nature of the underworld. According to Jesus’ teaching in Luke 16, in Sheol there is a chasm or pit that separates the rich man and Lazarus. Consistent with the Bible’s teaching about degrees of punishment, there appears to be degrees in the grave where the deepest levels of Sheol are reserved from the vilest of creatures. These levels “under” Abraham and Lazarus we can call hell, a place of torment.
Consider 2 Peter 2:4 which says, “God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment.” The word translated “hell” here is the Greek word tartarus. Tartarus was considered by the Greeks as a subterranean place lower than Hades where divine punishment was meted out. The Israelites used this same word to describe the lower places of the grave when the greatest enemies of God and righteousness would go. It’s dark in the grave, but down in the lower recesses of the pit is the gloomy darkness.
Jude also speaks about these fallen angels or demons. He says, “the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day.” These angels, along with the wicked dead are in Sheol, yet in different levels, waiting for the final judgment.[1]
Therefore, we can picture the underworld consisting of various levels. The righteous dead are at the highest level, resting in comfort at Abraham’s side. Beneath them are the wicked in different compartments, no one able to cross the threshold from one level to another. Like a dungeon, the lowest levels are reserved for the most heinous of enemies of the King.
Satan and the Underworld
The underworld is not Satan’s realm. Well, it is his home now, but it’s not what you think. He is not a red man with horns and a spiked tail and ruling with a pitchfork. Neither is he the one tormenting the dead or having a party with the wicked.
God has authority over the grave and over the underworld. Colossians 1:16 says, “For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him” (cf. 1 Sam 2:6).
Satan is not the ruler of hell, God is. Satan is not the prison guard. He is a prisoner. Isaiah 14 speaks of the devil and his desire to be exalted to the highest heaven, above God. Isaiah 14:13 says, “You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high.” But verse 15 says, “But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit.” I’m convinced that according to Revelation 20 that Satan is, at this time, in the bottomless pit, bound until the end of the age such that he cannot stop the advance of the gospel to all the nations. Certainly it can still be said that he is prowling around as a roaring lion seeking someone to devour, but he does so by proxy, using his demons to try to thwart God’s plan.
There is another word that you will come across in Scripture in reference to the underworld and to Satan. It is the word Abaddon. Job 26:6 says, “Sheol is naked before God, and Abaddon has no covering.” Proverbs 27:20 says, “Sheol and Abaddon are never satisfied.” The word means “destruction” and is used in relation to Sheol but in distinction from it. It is the place of the wicked dead, especially fallen angels and describes the lower regions of the underworld.
Consider Revelation 9 where it describes the bottomless pit to be opened to unleash its prisoners upon the earth. It says, “And the fifth angel blew his trumpet, and I saw a star fallen from heaven to earth [a demon], and he was given the key to the shaft of the bottomless pit. He opened the shaft of the bottomless pit, and from the shaft rose smoke like the smoke of a great furnace, and the sun and the air were darkened with the smoke from the shaft. Then from the smoke came locusts on the earth, and they were given power like the power of scorpions of the earth” (Rev 9:1–3). The text continues to speak about these forces of evil that are unleashed on the earth and says, “They have as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit. His name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is called Apollyon” (Rev 9:11). We see here that this fallen angel, whom many believe is a reference to Satan, is used of God to bring judgment upon the earth. He still operates under God’s command and with God’s permission but he is used to execute God’s judgment upon the earth by proxy. His name is Abaddon or Apollyon meaning he comes from the lowest level of the grave—Abaddon in Hebrew or “apoleia” in Greek. He is the King of evil, the Lord of darkness who is from the depths of darkness, the world under the underworld—the lowest hell.[2]
Jesus’ Descent into the Underworld
I want to change gears a little bit here. We’ve considered the underworld and its general shape and makeup. Now I want to consider Jesus and what happened when he died on the cross.
When Jesus died, he died as humans die. His divine nature did not die. No, the humanity of Christ died a human death.
When a human dies his spirit or soul leaves the body. We see a description of this in the gospels where Jesus voluntarily gives up his spirit and he breaths his last. We know where his body went. It was laid in a tomb lifeless. The body of Jesus was a corpse, buried in a grave. But what happened to his soul or spirit?
Like any man who died, the soul of Jesus went down to Sheol. Jesus descended into Hades.
Let me demonstrate that with Scripture.
In Acts 2 we have Peter preaching from the steps of the temple. Listen to his words, “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know—this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it. For David says concerning him, ‘I saw the Lord always before me, for he is at my right hand that I may not be shaken; therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced; my flesh also will dwell in hope. For you will not abandon my soul to Hades, or let your Holy One see corruption. You have made known to me the paths of life; you will make me full of gladness with your presence.’ Brothers, I may say to you with confidence about the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would set one of his descendants on his throne, he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses” (Acts 2:22–32).
Did you notice when Peter preaches, he quotes Psalm 16 and argues Jesus went to Hades but was not abandoned there and God raised him up? The two principal parts of man, soul and body were spared. His soul was delivered from Hades and his flesh did not rot away, but God raised his soul and reunited it to his resurrected body.
Remember when Mary spoke to Jesus by the tomb and went to cling to him? John 20:17 says, “Jesus said to her, ‘Do not cling to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’’” His soul went “down” in death, and not “up” to his Father until his ascension.
But what about the thief on the cross? In Luke 23 one of the criminals crucified with Jesus began to defend Christ saying he did nothing to deserve this. He said, “’Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.’ And [Jesus] said to him, ‘Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise’” (vv. 42–43). What is important here is to understand that paradise, at this time, was not in the presence of God in heaven, but by Abraham’s side in Sheol. This thief on the cross, just like Lazarus here Luke 16, will be carried by the angels to rest with Abraham and with Christ in his death.
But there is yet more.
Paul alludes to Jesus’ descent in Romans 10 when he writes, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’ (that is, to bring Christ down) or ‘Who will descend into the abyss?’ (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead)” (Rom 10:6–7). You cannot ascend to bring Christ down or descend to bring Christ up, but through believing in the gospel we are united to God and will be saved.
And Jesus himself is crystal clear in Matthew 12:39–40, when he responds to the Pharisees and says, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”
In fact, this truth so clear and universally accepted that it made it into the Apostles’’ Creed which says, “We believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord; who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the virgin, Mary; suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and buried; He descended into Hades; the third day He rose from the dead; He ascended into Heaven and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty...”
To quote Jesus speaking to Thomas the doubter, “Do not disbelieve, but believe” (John 20:27).
What Happened When Jesus Was in Hades?
The last thing we must consider is what Jesus did when he was in the grave. Three things are important to know.
1. He did not go down to suffer or pay a ransom price to the devil. Revelation 1:17–18 says, “Fear not, I am the first and the last, and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades.”
Earlier in Revelation 1 Jesus is the Lamb enthroned in heaven and is said to be “the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth” (Rev 1:5). By firstborn the Scriptures mean that it is his inheritance and under his control or dominion. The three realms, heaven, earth, and under the earth, are all under the authority of our Christ! He has the keys of Hades. It is under his control. He did not go there to suffer but as a victor.
2. He went to save his people trapped or imprisoned there. Even though his people were at Abraham’s side, they were still in the place of the dead. Jesus had come to rescue them and bring them up to his heavenly home.
Zechariah 9 elaborates and says, “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; righteous and having salvation is he, humble and mounted on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey” (v. 9). A few verses later it says, “As for you also, because of the blood of my covenant with you, I will set your prisoners free from the waterless pit…. On that day the Lord their God will save them, as the flock of his people; for like the jewels of a crown they shall shine on his land.” (v. 11, 16). The salvation of Christ includes those prisoners in the waterless pit—which we’ve seen already is another name for the grave or Sheol—and he will bring them to his home.
Paul also speaks of this in Ephesians 4. In verse 8 he quotes from Psalm 68 and says, “when [Christ] ascended on high he led a host of captives.” He explains in the next verse what he means and says, “In saying, ‘He ascended,’ what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower regions [of] the earth? He who descended is the one who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things” (vv. 9–10).[3]
Christ went down to the grave to free those in captivity. Those who had died believing in God and hoping in his deliverance were led out of the grave and ascended on high when Christ died and rose. He led a host of captives when he ascended from Hades.
In fact, if you continue reading in Psalm 68 (where Paul quotes from in Ephesians 4) it says, “Our God is a God of salvation, and to God, the Lord, belong deliverances from death…. The Lord said, ‘I will bring them back from the depths of the sea’” (Psalm 68:20, 22).
Jesus demonstrated his power over death, Hades, and the devil by leading a host of captives out of the grave and into the presence of God.[4]
3. Finally, Jesus descended into Hades to preach. 1 Peter 3:18–20 says, “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison, because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah.” I’ve already mentioned this passage. But now we see clearly that Jesus went and preached to the spirits in prison, in the underworld before he was made alive in the spirit.
What did he preach? We can only speculate, but I suppose that it was a cry of triumph over these fallen angels, and over those in darkness that he had conquered. The devils plan to put him to death, entering Judas to betray him, thinking the grave could hold him, were foolish and powerless. Rather it only went to serve God’s purposes! This could be why Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 2:8, “None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.” This could refer to the cosmic rulers that he speaks about in Ephesians 6. Perhaps they thought if they could get Christ into the underworld that the pit would close over him. But they were wrong. He went down so that he could free his prisoners.[5]
His sermon of victory would have been words of comfort to those who trusted God in hope. And then, he took those believers, by Abraham’s side, and took those Old Testament saints and brought them to heaven to be with himself.[6]
Conclusion
The doctrines set forth in this article are not meant to be debate fodder for theological nerds. Jesus descent into Sheol is a vivid picture of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Hades is impossible to escape. Heaven is impossible to enter. But Christ has broken the bars of Hades and opened wide the gates of heaven. He has the keys of death and hell, and he grants the keys of the kingdom to his followers.
Jesus came down to bring us up. He died to give us life. He bore our sin to become our righteousness. He accomplished his greatest victory, defeating death and the devil, through death itself and then was raised and is alive forevermore!
It is not death to die. We don’t need to be afraid even though we walk through the valley of the shadow of death, we should fear no evil. Christ has conquered.
This aspect of Christ atoning work is called Christus Victor and was taught be early church fathers like Irenaeus. Christ has rescued his people from the power of Satan and the grave and has established himself as King of the cosmos, the King of heaven, earth, and under the earth.
You must know this Christ. Do not be lost in deep darkness and in gloomy shadows, imprisoned without the hope of Jesus Christ. Repent of sin and trust Christ today.
[1] As an aside, I believe these angels are the “sons of God” in Genesis 6. 1 Peter 3:19–20 speaks about “spirits in prison, because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah.” I believe these are the sons of God, a term used for angelic creatures, in Genesis 6 who were part of the corruption and wickedness of the pre-fall world. They were judged and locked up in the pit, in tartarus, or in the abyss. The book of Enoch, a Jewish book written in the intertestamental period describes this event and is quoted by Jude as he speaks about the judgment. Other fallen angels knew this. Remember in Luke 8 when a legion of demons came out of a man and wanted to go into the pigs? It says in Luke 8:31 that “they begged him not to command them to depart into the abyss.” They did not want to suffer the same fate and be cast down into the depths of Sheol, into tartarus, the lowest levels of the underworld and out of the land of the living.
[2] I understand what some of you, possibly many of you are thinking. This seems far-fetched. It sounds more like fantasy than reality. We’ve been societally conditioned to think this way. But Ephesians 6:11–13 says, “Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm.”
The devil is not under every rock. And certainly too many attribute their own sin to the devil. But the unseen powers of darkness are real, they are working, and many are taking orders from the Lord of darkness, Abaddon, Satan himself. We must have a Biblical view of the world, both seen and unseen, and be careful not to trivialize spiritual realities that we are called to stand against in truth.
[3] The ESV translates this incorrectly. See Psalm 63:9 where the Greek text is the same as in Ephesians 4:9 and is translated, “shall go down into the depths of the earth.”
[4] Some believe that the first resurrection in Revelation 20 of the faithful to reign with Christ for 1000 years is this same group led from captivity. But the rest of the dead, it says in Revelation 20 do not come to life until the end of that 1000 years and the time of final judgment. These are the saints dressed in white waiting for Christ’s return in Revelation 6:9, 11. I don’t have space to elaborate so let the reader understand.
[5] After Christ’s descent into hell and ascent into heaven, those who die trusting in him, do not descend into Sheol or Hades, they go immediately into the presence of Jesus in the heavens. 2 Corinthians 5:1 says, “For we know that if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.” He continues and says, “We know that while we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord…we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Cor 5:6, 8). That is, for a believer to die now, they don’t go to Abraham’s side, they go to Christ’s side.
[6] Time prevents looking into Jesus’ ascent. This would be a profitable study in the future (Heb 9:11–12; 1:3; 7:27–8:2).
John Owen is considered one of the greatest Puritan theologians of all time. He was given the title of the “prince of the English divines.” John Owen was born in 1616 in Stadham, England, the second son of Henry Owen. Henry Owen was a Puritan Anglican minister who taught his son from a young age. John Owen showed a strong desire for learning and entered nearby Oxford University at age 12 and was a proven scholar, who loved the classics, mathematics, philosophy, theology, Latin, Hebrew, and rabbinical writings. He received his Bachelor of Arts in 1632 at the age of 16 and continued with a Master of Arts at the age of 19 in 1635. Historians believe that Owen studied eighteen to twenty hours per day.
Owen left Oxford in 1637 because of pressures from Archbishop Laud’s new statutes of conformity to the liturgy of worship. Being out of Oxford, He became a private chaplain and tutor, during this time he devoted himself to more study, and historians say that God richly blessed Owen during this time. At the age of twenty-six, Owen began a forty-one-year writing span that produced more than eighty works. Many of those would become classics and be greatly used by God.
In 1642 Owen’s life was about to change drastically during a church service at St. Mary Aldermanbury, London. Despite embracing Puritan convictions from his youth, Owen lacked personal assurance of faith. He expected to hear the famous Edmund Calamy preach at St. Mary’s, but a substitute was in the pulpit. Owen’s friend pressured him to leave to listen to a more famous minister some distance away, but Owen refused. The unknown substitute preacher chose as his text, “Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith?” God used that sermon from an unknown preacher to illuminate Owen’s heart to the Gospel and assured him of the faith that he was lacking in his young life. This may have been a watershed moment where he grew confident in his faith and was unapologetic about his convictions. Later in life, Owen tried to learn the identity of the preacher but had no success.
In 1644 Owen converted from Presbyterianism to Congregationalism convictions. He married Mary Rooke that same year who bore him 11 children, but, sadly, only a daughter survived into adulthood. Unfortunately, the daughter had an “unhappy marriage” to a Welshman and she returned home to live with Owen and his wife. She later died of consumption in her young adult life.
Owen’s fame spread rapidly in the late 1640s through his writing and preaching as an independent theologian while he was still in his 30s, Owen gained a wide reputation in England. This was not an easy time for him as Owen did not see the fruit of his labor which greatly discouraged him. It is said that he would trade all his learning for that of John Bunyan’s gift of “plain preaching.”
Due to Owen’s fame, he was asked to preach before Parliament on many occasions, including the day after the execution of King Charles I (1600-1649). The sermons he preached were impressive to Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658), and this created many new opportunities for influence opened up to Owen. He accompanied Cromwell on trips to Ireland and Scotland to help reform religious institutions and to convince the people of the rightfulness of ending monarchy in England. During Cromwell’s travels, Owen accompanied him as chaplain to Ireland to regulate the affairs of Trinity College in Dublin. It is said that Owen traveled with 12,000 psalm-singing, Puritan soldiers who descended upon Ireland. Owen being an academic spent most of his time while touring with Cromwell at Trinity College where he studied and preached. He ministered to the troops during the terrible massacre at Drogheda. That dreadful event resulted in the killing of priests, monks, and Irish Catholics alongside English Royalists. Civilians as well as soldiers were massacred. The result was that the Irish Catholics hated the English due to the death of close to 3,000 people. Owen’s soul was grieved by the event that, upon his return to England after a seven-month stay, Owen urged Parliament to show mercy to the Irish. In 1650, Owen was appointed as an official preacher to the state. The same year, Owen accompanied Cromwell on his Scottish expedition. He assisted Cromwell in trying to persuade the Scottish leaders and people of the rightness of cutting off the monarchy.
The 1650s were Owen’s most productive years. During that time he became dean of Christ Church College, Oxford, and later was made vice-chancellor of Oxford University, under the chancellorship of Cromwell whom Owen supported. He worked closely with Thomas Goodwin and shared the pulpit at St. Mary’s where they preached alternating Sundays, mortification of sin and dealing with temptation were common themes. Owen presided at most university meetings as administrator, his strong biblical convictions prevented much worldliness from entering the university. Owen established a strong reformed theology and Puritan lifestyle within Oxford, for example, he established boards to ensure Christian living at the university. Undergrads were required to share Sunday sermons with someone of “known ability and piety.” Owen established private evening prayer meetings for students and their mentors, and the houses where students lodged were to have frequent preaching within their homes. Under Owen’s leadership Oxford was revitalized and began to flourish after many challenges of the civil war years in England.
Owen published many books in the 1650s including books on the doctrines of grace, mortification of sin, communion with the Trinity, the authority of Scripture, and many more. In the late 1650s, he helped write the Savoy Declaration which is an independent Presbyterian congregationalist document, he was the primary author of its preface.
Owen fell out of favor with Cromwell when he opposed Cromwell becoming king. Owen’s large influence took a major blow when Cromwell resigned from being chancellor at Oxford and was replaced by Richard, Cromwell’s son. Under Richard’s leadership as chancellor, Owen was replaced as vice-chancellor, removed as dean of Christ Church, and preacher at St. Mary’s along with Goodwin. Simultaneously there was the Great Ejection of 1662 when 1,000-2,000 Puritan Church of England ministers were expelled from their pulpits by law following the Act of Uniformity of 1662 which Puritan ministers refused to subscribe to the Book of Common Prayer as the only book to be used in liturgical worship. Due to these circumstances, every position of influence was taken from him. Owen continued to be a minister of the Gospel where he lived in seclusion. John Cotton even offered Owen a position to be a minister in Boston, Massachusetts but he declined.
In 1665, Owen was charged and tried in Oxford for holding religious sermons in his home. Thankfully, Owen escaped without imprisonment, and like many ministers after the Act of Uniformity, he returned to London to preach to a small congregation. It was during this time he wrote his famous commentary on Hebrews. Owen continued his writings and theological battles by writing anonymous tracts on religious liberty and information against Arminian teaching.
In 1673, Owen joined his congregation with Joseph Caryl, and through his ministry, he sought to help his Independent (baptistic) brothers such as Robert Asty and John Bunyan by offering them financial support and spiritual advice. In 1676, Owen’s wife died and eighteen months later he married a widow. The years that followed were filled with much personal suffering where Owen experienced bouts of asthma and gallstones which kept him from preaching but did not stop him from writing many more books and treatises.
Owen died on August 24, 1683, and was buried in Bunhill Fields, London. Few have impacted Christianity the way Owen did. This was seen not only through his writings but also that he was also a pastor of people’s hearts. Some have dubbed him the “theologian’s theologian,” but Christians must not forget that he still cared for the souls of people as seen in the writings on the importance of mortifying sin and honoring Christ in all areas of life because it is a privilege that Christians can enjoy communion with God.
John Owen was a man who stuck to his convictions throughout his life. Owen kept his eyes fixed on Christ and equipped his students and future generations for Christ. He faced trials by being removed from positions of influence, possible imprisonment, and experiencing the loss of many children. Owen could have easily compromised by giving into the convictions of Parliament’s actions toward the Irish under Cromwell or in the Act of Uniformity of 1662 under Charles II, but he stood firm in his convictions to proclaim the Gospel whether that was through his preaching or writing. His preaching motivated many others to stand firm in the Gospel. Owen’s writing impacted his readers then and now, the power of his was both theological and pastoral impacting both the head and the heart. John Owen motivated people to know God and to “be killing sin or sin be killing you.”
J.I. Packer said, “I owe more to John Owen than to any other theologian, ancient or modern; and I owe more to The Mortification of Sin than to anything else he wrote.”
With Packer’s quote in mind, if you were to read one book by John Owen it should be: The Mortification of Sin. It will give you a glimpse into the reality of sin and how we need to be killing sin in our pursuit of communion with God.
Laurence Chaderton is a name that may not be known among many Christians, but his impact on Puritanism and Christianity would place him as a theological giant. History tells us that Chaderton was a “superb orator,” and could preach for hours with a captive audience. One time, while preaching a two-hour-long sermon he declared that he had tired the patience of the audience. The audience insisted that he continue preaching, and even one man in the congregation cried out, “For God’s sake, sir, go on!” Upon hearing the response of the congregation, he continued his sermon for another hour, to the joy of his hearers. Chaderton helped establish the famous Emmanuel College at Cambridge and served as its first Master. Emmanuel College was the institution that produced many famous Puritans during the 17th century. Some notable Puritans that came out of Emmanuel College were: Thomas Cartwright, William Perkins, Jeremiah Burroughs, Joseph Hall, Thomas Watson, Thomas Shepard, John Cotton, John Harved, and Thomas Hooker, these men and more were influenced by Chaderton.
Chaderton was born in Lancashire to a wealthy Roman Catholic family. During his time at Cambridge, his parents were disappointed when they learned Lawrence had become a Protestant with Puritan convictions at Cambridge. In response, his father wrote him a letter that said, “Dear Laurence, if you will renounce the new sect which you have joined you may expect all the happiness which the care of an indulgent father can secure you; otherwise I enclose in this letter a shilling to buy a wallet with. Go and beg for your living. Farewell!” Laurence declined his father’s offer and remained a disowned Protestant. Despite the challenges, he graduated with many degrees and became a lecturer at the college.
Chaderton was a lifelong student of theology, a mentor, and a popular preacher. For nearly fifty years he served as the afternoon lecturer at St. Clement’s, and through the influence of his preaching many young men began to study the Bible and practice godliness. He excelled in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. He also knew Spanish, Italian, and French. As a fellow of Christ’s College from 1568 to 1577 (when he married) his influence made the college ‘a Puritan seminary in all but name’, and his systematic program of bible study and discussion was revolutionary in Elizabethan England.
In 1584, he was approached by Sir Walter Mildmay to establish a new college at Cambridge.. Mildmay wanted Chaderton so badly to be the first master of the college, that if Chaderton refused the college would not exist. Any other institution would have offered Chaderton ten times more money than a newly established college. With Chaderton and Mildmay, Emmanuel College came into existence with Chaderton as its first master from 1584 until he stepped down in 1622, in his mid-eighties. It grieved him to step down as he enjoyed his role as master of the college and feared the college would lose its Puritan convictions. Chaderton was satisfied when John Preston was presented to him as his successor. Remarkably, he outlived Preston and his successor. Despite being retired, Chaderton was always consulted regarding the affairs of the college.
Chaderton represented the Puritans when he attended the Hampton Court Conference where the King James translation was first proposed in 1604. There were only four Puritans invited to the court, compared to the fifty Anglican ministers led by Richard Bancroft who were invited by James I. There was tension between the two groups, the Puritans wanted more reform and pushed their view of the ecclesiological structure being more faithful to the Bible, and the Anglicans wanted the church to remain the same. King James denied the Puritans’ desire for reform but allowed them to participate in the translation of the Bible. Bancroft tried to shut down the Puritans, but James encouraged the continued help of the Puritans wanting to have his new translation of the Bible in the churches around England that reflected the Hebrew and Greek texts. Chaderton was enlisted as a translator of the King James Bible and served in the First Cambridge Company, a group that translated from First Chronicles to the Song of Solomon, and many of the Psalms in the Bible. He used his linguistic expertise in Hebrew to lead the company to translate and he also used the (older) Geneva Bible as a reference to aid in his translation. One of the notable areas of translation is the linguistic poetic style of Psalm 23 which Chaderton played a major role in translating to English. Chaderton was 75 when the KJV was first published and he lived to be over 100.
In 1640 Chaderton’s long life, which had been greatly used by the Lord, drew to a close. Those who knew him reported that his wits were still with him and his eyes had not grown dim. In his memory, a monumental slab bearing a simple inscription was placed over his remains at the entrance of the college chapel. One man who knew Chaderton well summarized his life saying, “He lived to free men’s souls from the slavery of ignorance and sin and win them to Christ.”
What should Christians do with passages of Scripture that speak about the everlasting covenant God made with Abraham and the nation of Israel?
Psalm 105:8–11 says, “[The Lord our God] remembers his covenant forever, the word that he commanded, for a thousand generations, the covenant that he made with Abraham, his sworn promise to Isaac, which he confirmed to Jacob as a statute, to Israel as an everlasting covenant, saying, ‘To you I will give the land of Canaan as your portion for an inheritance.’”
Does this promise apply to the church? Is this an abiding promise for national or ethnic Israel and not the church? Has it been abrogated? Has it been fulfilled? How are we to interpret such Scripture passages?
These questions are part of a larger discussion concerning the relationship between Israel and the Church. Everyone agrees that there are elements of continuity and discontinuity between the Old and New Testaments. But where do you draw those lines? Theological systems like covenant theology and dispensationalism diverge sharply at this point.
Much ink has been spilt on this subject and I don’t presume to solve every issue in this article, but I do want to provide some aid in thinking about the land promise repeated in Scripture.
Here in Psalm 105:11, we see the land of Canaan as part of the everlasting covenant God made with Abraham. In Galatians 3, Paul makes the case that the promises given to Abraham are abiding. He writes, “To give a human example, brothers: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified. Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, ‘And to offsprings,’ referring to many, but referring to one, ‘And to your offspring,’ who is Christ. This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void. For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise” (Gal 3:15–18).
If the covenant promises God made to Abraham are abiding and the giving of the law or the coming of Christ does not abrogate it or add to it, then what do we do with the land promise? Was the land promise for Israel and remains reserved for Israel in the future? Does the coming of Christ and his identity as “the offspring” affect the land promise? What we will see in Scripture is that the Gentiles have become full heirs of the promises given to Abraham through faith in Christ—including the land.
Gentile Believers Included in the Land Promise
By the incredible grace of God, Gentiles who have faith in Christ are included in the blessings spoken to Abraham. Galatians 3:13–14 says, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us … so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we might receive the promised Spirit through faith.”
If the Gentiles are included in the blessing of Abraham through faith in Christ, does this include the land promise given to Abraham?
Consider the sermon on the mount where Jesus promised, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” The Greek word translated “earth” can also be translated “land” (cf. Acts 7:3, 6; Matt 2:20; 27:45 where the same word is translated as “land”). In other words, the meek in Christ—whether Jew or Gentile—shall inherit the land.
We also see in Revelation that the nations redeemed by the Lamb will inherit the land. Revelation 5:9–10 says, “Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation, and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on the earth.” Again, the phrase “on the earth” can be translated “in the land.” In fact, this is how the ESV translates the phrase in Ephesians 6 when Paul commands children to obey their parents, quoting the 5th commandment, and says, “that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land” (Eph 6:3).[1] The blessing of the land, made to the children of the old covenant, is applied to Gentile believers in Jesus Christ under the new covenant!
The Expansion of the Land Promise
It is clear in Revelation how the promise of the land is not confined to ethnic Jews or the region of Palestine. Rather, the land promise now extends to cover the earth! Revelation 21 speaks of a new heaven and new earth in which God’s people will dwell in the presence of the Lamb.
Some indeed maintain that these promises given to Abraham will be fulfilled in a future, national state of Israel in the land of Palestine serving Christ. This is referred to as Christ’s millennial reign where the temple will be reconstructed, memorial sacrifices will be offered, and the “unfulfilled promises” of the old covenant will find their fulfillment.
Those holding to this interpretation would argue that I’m reading New Testament passages back into the Old Testament in an illegitimate way. They would see my argument thus far as violating the context and literal interpretation of the Old Testament.
However, I believe this objection to be unfounded and plan to demonstrate that these New Testament promises—which include the Gentiles in the land promise—do not originate with the New Testament but were taught in the Old Testament.
The Old Testament Promises Include Gentiles in the Land
The expansion of the land promise and the inclusion of the Gentiles in the New Testament is consistent with the promises of the Old Testament.
Consider Isaiah 66:18–21 which says, “For I know their works and their thoughts, and the time is coming to gather all nations and tongues. And they shall come and shall see my glory…. to the coastlands far away, that have not heard my fame or seen my glory. And they shall declare my glory among the nations. And they shall bring all your brothers from all the nations as an offering to the Lord, on horses and in chariots and in litters and on mules and on dromedaries, to my holy mountain Jerusalem, says the Lord, just as the Israelites bring their grain offering in a clean vessel to the house of the Lord. And some of them also I will take for priests and for Levites, says the Lord.”
We see here the Gentiles—all nations and tongues—coming to declare the glory of God and worship him. God will even take these Gentiles and make them priests! This passage reads like Revelation 5:9–10. This should not surprise us since Isaiah 66 speaks about the new heavens and new earth as well.
Similar promises of Gentile incorporation into the end-time people of God are expressed in other prophetic writings (see Jer. 3:16–4:4; Amos 9:11–15; Mic 4:1–3; Zech 8:7–8, 20–23).
The inclusion of the Gentiles can be understood as an expansion of the promises of God given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel). This does not replace Israel, or the promises given to Israel. We should be able to affirm that Romans 11 speaks about the conversion of ethnic Israel and the grafting in of the Gentiles into the promises given to Abraham through Christ.
This expansion of the promise to Israel to include the Gentiles is not a teaching read back into the Old Testament (see verses cited above), and neither is the expansion of the land promise to include the nations of the earth a New Testament teaching read back into the Old Testament. There is an expansion of the land promise explicitly taught in the Old Testament.
Genesis 15:18–19 says, “On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, ‘To your offspring I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates.’”
That promise from river to river is expanded in Psalm 72. In Psalm 72:8 it says, “May he have dominion from sea to sea, and from the River to the ends of the earth!” If you continue reading this psalm, you will see verses 9–17 include the nations as part of God’s promised land and inheritance.[2]
Lest we downplay the significance of Psalm 72 as poetic overstatement, God expanded the land promise when he spoke to Jacob (Israel). In Genesis 28:14 it says, “Your offspring shall be like the dust of the earth, and you shall spread abroad to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south, and in you and your offspring shall all the families of the earth be blessed.”
The same hope of the borders of Israel, God’s promised land, to cover the earth is expressed by the prophet Isaiah. Isaiah 54:1–3 says, “‘Sing, O barren one, who did not bear; break forth into singing and cry aloud, you who have not been in labor! For the children of the desolate one will be more than the children of her who is married,’ says the Lord. ‘Enlarge the place of your tent, and let the curtains of your habitations be stretched out; do not hold back; lengthen your cords and strengthen your stakes. For you will spread abroad to the right and to the left, and your offspring will possess the nations and will people the desolate cities.’”
What is clear in these texts is that the Old Testament itself predicts the inclusion of the Gentiles into God’s covenant, making them priests, and expanding the land promise to include the nations. The whole earth is the Lord’s (Psalm 24:1). Christ will be exalted over the all earth, redeeming it for his own by his shed blood.
The Promised Land and Eden
It needs to be remembered that the land promise did not begin in Genesis 12 with the promises given to Abraham. To land promised to Abraham is not the baseline to which all references to land should be compared. The land promise goes back to the garden of Eden where God planted a garden and called Adam and Eve to cultivate it for the glory of God. The language of Eden is used at the end of the story when Revelation 22 speaks about the river of life and the tree of life. Again the Lord will walk with his people in the cool of the day.
Between the Eden of Genesis and the Eden of Revelation, the promised land spoken of in the Old Testament is also repeatedly linked to the garden of Eden (cf. Isaiah 51:2–3; Ezek 36:35; 47:1–12; Joel 2:3; Zech 14:8–11). The presence of God in the garden was manifest in the land of Israel and is being manifest throughout the earth today, and in the future will cover the earth leading to an Edenic state in all the earth.
The land promise is not exclusively for ethnic Israelites. The land promise is Christ’s inheritance. It was won by Christ’s victory when Adam and others failed. It is his inheritance which he will divide with those who have faith in him (Isaiah 53:12; Matt 5:5; Rev 5:9–10; 21–22)—both Jew and Gentile.
To use Paul’s words in Galatians 3, the land is not the possession of Israel but of Christ. It is in Christ that all the promises of God are “Yes” and “Amen” (2 Cor 1:20).
One Last Objection
There is one nagging objection that I’ve failed to address thus far. What about the literal boundaries that God promised to Abraham? Isn’t an expansion a violation of what was originally promised? How can we have confidence in what God has promised us if it can be expanded or altered in any way?
These are great questions. Let me be clear that I don’t believe the promises given to Abraham are strictly figurative, typological, or find their “spiritual fulfillment” in Jesus and the new heavens and new earth. Rather, the promises given to Abraham and Israel were literally fulfilled but the promises are also part of a larger story of the land that began in Genesis and reaches its climax in Revelation—all of it centering on Christ.
Several passages in the Old Testament speak to the literal fulfillment of the land promises given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel). Joshua 21:43–45 says, “Thus the Lord gave to Israel all the land that he swore to give to their fathers. And they took possession of it, and they settled there. And the Lord gave them rest on every side just as he had sworn to their fathers. Not one of all their enemies had withstood them, for the Lord had given all their enemies into their hands. Not one word of all the good promises that the Lord had made to the house of Israel had failed; all came to pass.”
Nehemiah 9:7–8 also says, “You are the Lord, the God who chose Abram and brought him out of Ur of the Chaldeans and gave him the name Abraham. You found his heart faithful before you, and made with him the covenant to give to his offspring the land of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the Perizzite, the Jebusite, and the Girgashite. And you have kept your promise, for you are righteous.”
These passages demonstrate that God’s promise to Abraham found literal fulfillment in the conquest. But just as we see a pattern of rest (Gen 2:3; Exod 20:11; Psalm 95:7–11; Heb 4:8–11) where there is fulfillment in a creation rest, a weekly rest, the rest of the conquest, and the rest in Christ. So too do we see a pattern of the land in the fulfillment of God’s promises from Eden to Palestine to the ends of the earth.
We are now waiting, in Christ, for the whole world to be filled with his glory! The coastlands, the far reaches of the earth, are waiting for his rule. The land is part of the blessed hope of every believer. This hope is not just for the Jew but also the Gentile grafted into the promises of God through Jesus Christ.
“He will not grow faint or be discouraged till he has established justice in the earth; and the coastlands wait for his law” (Isaiah 42:4).
“It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to bring back the preserved of Israel; I will make you as a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth” (Isaiah 49:6).
Amen!
—Tim Stephens
[1] Both passages end with “ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς” translated by the ESV as “on the earth” in Rev 5:10 and “in the land” in Eph 6:3.
[2] “May he have dominion from sea to sea, and from the River to the ends of the earth! May desert tribes bow down before him, and his enemies lick the dust! May the kings of Tarshish and of the coastlands render him tribute; may the kings of Sheba and Seba bring gifts! May all kings fall down before him, all nations serve him!
Long may he live; may gold of Sheba be given to him! May prayer be made for him continually, and blessings invoked for him all the day! May there be abundance of grain in the land; on the tops of the mountains may it wave; may its fruit be like Lebanon; and may people blossom in the cities like the grass of the field! May his name endure forever, his fame continue as long as the sun! May people be blessed in him, all nations call him blessed!” (Psalm 72:8–11, 15–17)